Why All The Hate For TMNT: Re-shelled?

It makes me mad to read these reviews. I haven't even played the game, but if it is is the same gameplay as the orignal then it should be rated about 95/100. I don't understand what could possibly be bad about this game. It was one of my very favourites on Super Nintendo and I have so many great memories of having so much fun playing it with friends. I don't see any need to add anything new to it. The fact that is has updated graphics seems to be the only update it needs and is a great positive. How can they give Street Fighter 4 such great reviews when it is basically the same game as Street Fighter 2 with updated graphics, and give this game such poor reviews because it offers nothing new?!?! It doesn't make any sense to me at all. More complicated does not mean better. Some of the simpleset games are the most fun.Why All The Hate For TMNT: Re-shelled?
I had a blast playin that ****. Worth the 800 points Why All The Hate For TMNT: Re-shelled?
Its not so much that the game is bad so to say. It's actually pretty good for some nice co-op beat em up action. It's just what Ubisoft did was they took out all the stuff that made playing ninja turtles fun in my opinion. I know its hard to live up to a SNES/ Arcade classic like the original, but its the little things like no triple combo, clunky controls, the throwing mechanics, etc. Then you throw in the huge issues (in my opinion) like the extremely short story mode and just the terrible butchered music.I guess I expect too much considering this is one of my favorite original games all time. But I, among other fans were greatly dissapointed. New comers to the series may find it great, but in my opinion this game is nothing like its original counterpart.
too expensive?, i dont know, looks cool to me
Because the $10 is overpriced for an outdated genre. Beat em up games like Double Dragon, Final Fight etc have been dead since basically the mid 90's The last good beat em up games were Guardian Heroes for the Saturn and Panzer Bandit for the Playstation 1. $10 for a half hour to an hour's wroth of gameplay is inexcusable even for a downloadable title. True some games are outdated like Doom, Duke Nukem, 3d, and Wolfenstein, but those games are a benchmark for gaming. they only cost 5 dollars and they give you much more bang for your buck. It is shameful that MS was thinking about charging 15 dollars for this at one point when the Banjo Kazooie games offer much more for that amount. Even $15 for those games is pushing it when you can get Mario 64 for $10 on Wii and FF7 for $10 on PS3. You are letting nastalgia cloud your judgment.They tried to revive the beat em up genre on PS1 with Fighting force and Spawn and on PS2 with Bouncer and a couple other games. The genre is a waste nowadays.
[QUOTE=''MCH'']It makes me mad to read these reviews. I haven't even played the game, but if it is is the same gameplay as the orignal then it should be rated about 95/100. I don't understand what could possibly be bad about this game. It was one of my very favourites on Super Nintendo and I have so many great memories of having so much fun playing it with friends. I don't see any need to add anything new to it. The fact that is has updated graphics seems to be the only update it needs and is a great positive. How can they give Street Fighter 4 such great reviews when it is basically the same game as Street Fighter 2 with updated graphics, and give this game such poor reviews because it offers nothing new?!?! It doesn't make any sense to me at all. More complicated does not mean better. Some of the simpleset games are the most fun.[/QUOTE]



Street fighter 4 is not the same game as Street fighter 2. Theyre very different in terms of combos, balancing etc



Beat em ups arent as popular these days and theres no beebop and rocksteady.



Remakes need updates. Look at the gamecube RE1
I haven't played it, but everyone I've talked to says that it's NOT the same gameplay. They simplified it and made it easier when there was no point in it, and doesn't play like the same game with 3D graphics. It's ragged on because it was a bad remake.
ok i was jus comparing this remake with my SNES copy and the truth is the SNES ver. is WAY BETTER!!! the art style, music and controls are way better on snes
[QUOTE=''MAILER_DAEMON'']I haven't played it, but everyone I've talked to says that it's NOT the same gameplay. They simplified it and made it easier when there was no point in it, and doesn't play like the same game with 3D graphics. It's ragged on because it was a bad remake.[/QUOTE]I never played the original Turtles in Time, but I have played the other old Turtles games, and I can assure you this is true - it isn't the same gameplay. It is pretty awful, but still entertaining to some degree. It would have made a much better cell phone game IMO.
gameplay wise it is fine. Yeah the 3D does change it up from the classic 2D, but that doesn't mean it is worse. I however dislike the music. The classic music and voices or sounds for that matter were awesome compared to this new stuff.But anyway it is just peoples opinions. I like this someone likes that and it doesn't mean one is better or worse.
[QUOTE=''Agent_Kaliaver'']gameplay wise it is fine. Yeah the 3D does change it up from the classic 2D, but that doesn't mean it is worse. I however dislike the music. The classic music and voices or sounds for that matter were awesome compared to this new stuff.



But anyway it is just peoples opinions. I like this someone likes that and it doesn't mean one is better or worse.[/QUOTE]

uhm i think in everyones op the SNES is better than the remake
I LOVE the original. it saddens me to hear such negative comments. I'll play the demo :P
there are 2 things that mad me mad. 1 is the took out one of my favorite stage inside the technodrome which would have been stage 4. The second is the narrator. i used to love the way they said the name off the stage. Now the way it is very meh at best. On the good note i did have alot of fun in the 4 player coop with friends of mine.
I got it, and beat it 4 times already. It only takes an hour to beat the game. They dumbed down the gameplay and made the levels REALLY short. It's nothing like the original.



BUT, I liked it nonetheless. All thanks to the survival mode. :)
I had a good time with this remake, but utterly disappointed in it also, the original SNES and Arcade versions are literally the best Turtles games ever made, but this remake took away from all that, for starters the updated graphics, control scheme, and gameplay just didn't do it for me, and didn't feel the same as the past versions.''Ubisoft, please consider a re-release or free patch to add the original versions of this game, I would have loved to play the SNES game remade or not.
honestly i'd rather go out and hunt for an SNES and a copy of the SNES version.
since people say its easier...is there a hard mode?
Who's hating? who doesnt love TMNT?!
uhm i think saying everyone would be untruthful because i stated i didn't think it was better or worse, but different. That makes what you said not really right.... kind of question why you said it anyway...
People who say it's nothing like the original are blinded by nostalgia. The fact of the matter is, the game is pretty simple and didn't age as well as people thought. It's not bad at all, it's just average by today's standards.

makeup